Justin Baldoni sues Blake Lively over sexual harassment allegations

Published 19h ago

Share

In a dramatic turn of events, Justin Baldoni has launched a $400 million (R7,522,940,000) defamation lawsuit against actor Blake Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds, and her publicist, Leslie Sloane, after Lively accused Baldoni of sexual harassment during filming.

The case is poised to unfold in court, bringing to light a complex dispute with serious implications for both sides.

The 40-year-old Baldoni, known for his roles in popular television series, has stated that he is prepared to present a significant amount of evidence to refute the claims made against him.

His attorney, Bryan Freedman, expressed confidence in Baldoni's position, asserting, “This lawsuit is a legal action based on an overwhelming amount of untampered evidence detailing Blake Lively and her team’s duplicitous attempt to destroy Justin Baldoni, his team and their respective companies.”

Freedman vowed to reveal all relevant communications, videos, and documentation that he believes will clear Baldoni’s name.

Freedman’s statement strongly condemns Lively's allegations, stating that she has attempted to “bulldoze reputations” via a media campaign that misrepresents the truth, either through manipulation or misinformation.

“Blake Lively was either severely misled by her team or intentionally and knowingly misrepresented the truth,” he continued, declaring the legal confrontation as a fight for truth in the court of public opinion.

Countering Baldoni's lawsuit, Lively's legal representatives maintain that her charges of sexual harassment and retaliation are “backed by concrete facts.” In a statement provided to People magazine, her team asserted, “This is not a ‘feud’ arising from ‘creative differences’ or a ‘he said/she said’ situation.”

They describe Baldoni's lawsuit as a retaliatory move, accusing him and his associates of engaging in “unlawful, retaliatory astroturfing” against Lively for her attempts to protect herself and others on set.

Highlighting the gravity of the allegations involved, Lively’s lawyers accused Baldoni of employing “classic tactics to distract from allegations of this type of misconduct,” focusing on victim-blaming and downplaying the severity of the claims.

They insisted that Baldoni and his team’s media statements do not constitute a valid defence against legal claims, stating, “We will continue to prosecute her claims in federal court, where the rule of law determines who prevails.”

In the midst of these unfolding legal battles, Baldoni's team claims that Lively’s lawsuit is an attempt to reshape her public image through “salacious, headline-grabbing allegations.” They voiced their intent to pursue the case with transparency, emphasising the importance of making all documents available for public review to establish the truth behind the matter.

With both parties preparing for a showdown in federal court, this turbulent saga reflects the increasing tensions in the entertainment industry regarding allegations of misconduct, and raises integral questions about accountability and regaining reputations after serious accusations.

IOL Entertainment